Presently, the US Copyright, rules, and processes to ensure it can fulfill its important role in the copyright system, including providing copies of deposit works for inclusion in the Library’s collections. In the latest rulemaking on electronic deposits, the copyright industry lobby rais concerns about the Office’s proposal to expand the Library’s access to electronically-deposit works; as we explain below, those concerns are unfound.
Under 37 Code of Feral Regulations modernizing its systems
§ 202.18, the Library may provide limit on-site special database to groups of newspapers electronically submitt for registration, as well as electronic serials and books submitt for mandatory deposit. The Copyright Office has propos expanding the categories of electronic deposits cover by the regulation with the same limitations on access as are currently in place. Specifically, the works may only be access under the supervision of Library staff through computer terminals in the Library’s reading rooms.
These terminals are not connect to
The Internet and the input/output connections (USB, etc.) are disabl. Libraries support expanding on-site access rules to new categories of deposits to ensure that over time, the public can continue to access works in the Library’s collection.
During a public comment period for
This propos rule, groups representing rightsholders surfac concerns about infringement, and urg the Office to heighten security and protection of electronic deposit copies before instituting its propos rule. As SPN observes in its reply comments, there is no serious basis for these concerns, as the security measures in place already render electronic materials less accessible and less susceptible to misuse than traditional print formats.
Rightsholder groups also suggest
Tat licenses are necessary when the thousands of new items enter into the Office transfers deposits to the Library, and australia email list the Library provides digital access to works. The Internet Archive notes that a licensing regime is not necessary to permit access to the Library’s collections, explaining that “the Copyright